marc
2015-12-03 16:46:30 UTC
ei hi all
i believe in a common vocabulary for content types in free social
networks, to ease federation and because i see limited dynamics in many
activist orientated social networks.
i believe there could be a limit of vocabulary terms for the concepts of
info, comment, vote, task and law, and so i have specified a list of
them with my own aesthetic taxonomic depth. which finally each platform
could implement parts of it (i.e. info-debate-vote navigation for a
classical political forum-groupware software, forum-tasks-etc for a more
clasical tracker software)
i am only minding about federation of public content in public groups.
i finally wish
-customize your platform content creation *and* federations of those
with other platforms
for also
-marking (wysywyg-etc style) a part of info of a public microblog text
comment made on a gnusocial to be feeded in a forum thread or category
in retroshare, and the way back.
my actual (lame) doubts are
-whether this common vocabulary is any or really wished, at a global
estrategical point of view. or we are more looking at a killer platform
for classical social network and another one for groupware and do a
"one" gateway "patch" between both "only".
-what will it mean for gnusocial code to adapt their content types to
such a common content types vocabulary?
-what else am i missing?
well,
apologies for my technical understandig limitations and hope this thread
to be of any interest for you or find for myself previous or actual
related efforts anywhere you could point me to to test the specification
i made that i am shy about sending it to you now in this message...
bests!
i believe in a common vocabulary for content types in free social
networks, to ease federation and because i see limited dynamics in many
activist orientated social networks.
i believe there could be a limit of vocabulary terms for the concepts of
info, comment, vote, task and law, and so i have specified a list of
them with my own aesthetic taxonomic depth. which finally each platform
could implement parts of it (i.e. info-debate-vote navigation for a
classical political forum-groupware software, forum-tasks-etc for a more
clasical tracker software)
i am only minding about federation of public content in public groups.
i finally wish
-customize your platform content creation *and* federations of those
with other platforms
for also
-marking (wysywyg-etc style) a part of info of a public microblog text
comment made on a gnusocial to be feeded in a forum thread or category
in retroshare, and the way back.
my actual (lame) doubts are
-whether this common vocabulary is any or really wished, at a global
estrategical point of view. or we are more looking at a killer platform
for classical social network and another one for groupware and do a
"one" gateway "patch" between both "only".
-what will it mean for gnusocial code to adapt their content types to
such a common content types vocabulary?
-what else am i missing?
well,
apologies for my technical understandig limitations and hope this thread
to be of any interest for you or find for myself previous or actual
related efforts anywhere you could point me to to test the specification
i made that i am shy about sending it to you now in this message...
bests!