Discussion:
[GNU/consensus] In Memoriam Aaron Swartz
hellekin
2014-01-11 16:09:58 UTC
Permalink
One year ago, on January 11th, 2013, a young hacker dedicated to the
advancement of freedom, knowledge, and convinced of the power of
individuals and collectives to bring forth humane values for a more
egalitarian world, decided that he could not win the legitimate
struggle he had been fighting for since he was a child, and chose to
remove himself from our world, to comply with the corrupt order that
suppresses life where it flourishes, and punishes the just for wishing
to abide by the Constitution and general interest rather than the rule
of the powerful criminal few and their particular interests.

His shock at being excruciated for liberating knowledge that should be
public given the sources of its funding, and the purpose of its
creation, and to be persecuted for doing what is right according to
the spirit of his own country, and the narrative of the so-called free
world, cornered him into a dead end. It came as a hard deadline for
many of us, especially those close to him, for they knew the human
becoming that he was, where most of us could only recognize his genius
through his inspiring words and actions.

With his life, Aaron Swartz took for shroud the veil of the illusion
of the free world's narrative. Along with other suppressed freedom
fighters, Julian Assange, Barret Brown, Chelsea Manning, Edward
Snowden, etc., he contributed to demonstrate that however hard we want
to think about freedom, democracy, humanity, we're not there anymore:
that path and dream were stolen from us and we're like insects
following a light in the dark, taking it for the Sun, only to discover
when it's too late, that we've been lured into a death trap.

Repeating "I knew, I knew" won't do it this time. It's time to
recover from the shock, and plant a new path, a new dreamscape, and
that must be one of caring and sharing, one of humane and human spirit
and community, and a path that can only be taken one by one, by each
of us, to become the drops that will grow into a rain and wash away
the nightmare that paranoid punishers want to impose on us. Whatever
their narrative, we all know their ethics do not match their words,
however beautiful and inspiring they can be: their time is done, as
much as the time of kings and awe-inspired rulers was half-a-millenium
ago. Our narrative must be complex, multiple, planetary, far-seeing,
and will impose itself by the numbers, and not by force.

Hackers can only act so far as to constrain the technology to embed
this ethics and this dreamscape into code, and choose to orient the
politics of the technique towards personal empowerment, and collective
freedom. There's no technological solution to mental slavery, but
indeed there's a tension built-in the tools we make, that can help
anyone to make choices for themselves and the rest of us.

If the Nasty Stooges of America founded its cosmogony on George
Orwell's 1984, we must stick to our fundamentals, and see how the
military machine of the Listeners has in the 20th Century been
subverted, appropriated, and expanded by the likes of Alan Turing,
Alan Kay, Douglas Engelbart, John C. Licklider, and many more to build
the Internet, this revolutionary expansion of the individual mind,
into a reflection of a collective mind, and an enabler of collective
intelligence that is revealing the complexity of our social agency.

We must use it as a tool not to build more technology, that most of it
would be qualified by Ted Nelson as "packaging", but to bring
ourselves together into solving the most pressing and global
challenges that humanity has been facing in its recorded history:
world hunger, unleashing of fanaticisms, proliferation of nuclear
weapons, degradation of the biosphere[0], etc. for humanity to succeed
despite the obvious will or suicidal panic of a few.

This is an omni-directional endeavor of unprecedented proportions and
not one single individual can understand all the keys to make it
happen--neither will any single non-human institution such as a
nation-state nor a corporation. But together, given the right
narrative, the will to succeed, the tools to facilitate our will, and
the tools to make it difficult and fastidious to oppose us, we shall
prevail[1].

Nobody should be able to cut the wings of another Aaron Swartz, and
the Aaron Swartz that still lives in each of us should be another
shield against arbitrary, uninformed, fanatic, cruel, and idiotic
decisions that wish to punish instead of educating. When society
turns against its own subjects, we can diagnose metastasis. It's time
for a cure.

==
hk

[0] In the words of Edgard Morin
[1] In the purity of essence of our bodily fluids.
Melvin Carvalho
2014-01-12 07:15:00 UTC
Permalink
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
One year ago, on January 11th, 2013, a young hacker dedicated to the
advancement of freedom, knowledge, and convinced of the power of
individuals and collectives to bring forth humane values for a more
egalitarian world, decided that he could not win the legitimate
struggle he had been fighting for since he was a child, and chose to
remove himself from our world, to comply with the corrupt order that
suppresses life where it flourishes, and punishes the just for wishing
to abide by the Constitution and general interest rather than the rule
of the powerful criminal few and their particular interests.
His shock at being excruciated for liberating knowledge that should be
public given the sources of its funding, and the purpose of its
creation, and to be persecuted for doing what is right according to
the spirit of his own country, and the narrative of the so-called free
world, cornered him into a dead end. It came as a hard deadline for
many of us, especially those close to him, for they knew the human
becoming that he was, where most of us could only recognize his genius
through his inspiring words and actions.
With his life, Aaron Swartz took for shroud the veil of the illusion
of the free world's narrative. Along with other suppressed freedom
fighters, Julian Assange, Barret Brown, Chelsea Manning, Edward
Snowden, etc., he contributed to demonstrate that however hard we want
that path and dream were stolen from us and we're like insects
following a light in the dark, taking it for the Sun, only to discover
when it's too late, that we've been lured into a death trap.
Repeating "I knew, I knew" won't do it this time. It's time to
recover from the shock, and plant a new path, a new dreamscape, and
that must be one of caring and sharing, one of humane and human spirit
and community, and a path that can only be taken one by one, by each
of us, to become the drops that will grow into a rain and wash away
the nightmare that paranoid punishers want to impose on us. Whatever
their narrative, we all know their ethics do not match their words,
however beautiful and inspiring they can be: their time is done, as
much as the time of kings and awe-inspired rulers was half-a-millenium
ago. Our narrative must be complex, multiple, planetary, far-seeing,
and will impose itself by the numbers, and not by force.
Hackers can only act so far as to constrain the technology to embed
this ethics and this dreamscape into code, and choose to orient the
politics of the technique towards personal empowerment, and collective
freedom. There's no technological solution to mental slavery, but
indeed there's a tension built-in the tools we make, that can help
anyone to make choices for themselves and the rest of us.
If the Nasty Stooges of America founded its cosmogony on George
Orwell's 1984, we must stick to our fundamentals, and see how the
military machine of the Listeners has in the 20th Century been
subverted, appropriated, and expanded by the likes of Alan Turing,
Alan Kay, Douglas Engelbart, John C. Licklider, and many more to build
the Internet, this revolutionary expansion of the individual mind,
into a reflection of a collective mind, and an enabler of collective
intelligence that is revealing the complexity of our social agency.
We must use it as a tool not to build more technology, that most of it
would be qualified by Ted Nelson as "packaging", but to bring
ourselves together into solving the most pressing and global
world hunger, unleashing of fanaticisms, proliferation of nuclear
weapons, degradation of the biosphere[0], etc. for humanity to succeed
despite the obvious will or suicidal panic of a few.
It is true that Ted Nelson once described the web as packaging. The reason
for this was that the browser existed already, as did forms of HTML. HTTP
was new as was the browser connected to the internet. Also the first
browser worldwideweb was an editor, functionality that was removed later.

Aaron was a big believer in making the web better, and was a regular
attendee at the Linked Data meetups in Boston.

By all means honor his memory, we should all do this, but please try not to
use tragedy to reflect your own personal views, which he may not have
shared.
This is an omni-directional endeavor of unprecedented proportions and
not one single individual can understand all the keys to make it
happen--neither will any single non-human institution such as a
nation-state nor a corporation. But together, given the right
narrative, the will to succeed, the tools to facilitate our will, and
the tools to make it difficult and fastidious to oppose us, we shall
prevail[1].
Nobody should be able to cut the wings of another Aaron Swartz, and
the Aaron Swartz that still lives in each of us should be another
shield against arbitrary, uninformed, fanatic, cruel, and idiotic
decisions that wish to punish instead of educating. When society
turns against its own subjects, we can diagnose metastasis. It's time
for a cure.
==
hk
[0] In the words of Edgard Morin
[1] In the purity of essence of our bodily fluids.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=Q6Zg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
SocialSwarm mailing lists: https://socialswarm.net/en/participate/
Websites: https://socialswarm.net/ https://wiki.socialswarm.net/
Liquid Feedback: https://socialswarm.tracciabi.li/
hellekin
2014-01-12 16:51:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Melvin Carvalho
It is true that Ted Nelson once described the web as packaging.
The reason for this was that the browser existed already, as did
forms of HTML. HTTP was new as was the browser connected to the
internet. Also the first browser worldwideweb was an editor,
functionality that was removed later.
Aaron was a big believer in making the web better, and was a
regular attendee at the Linked Data meetups in Boston.
By all means honor his memory, we should all do this, but please
try not to use tragedy to reflect your own personal views, which
he may not have shared.
*** Your interpretation is paranoid. As you're the one mentioning the
Web and Linked Data, are you not the one who is abusing my genuine
remembrance to serve your own agenda?

In addition to "explaining" what Ted Nelson understands as "packaging
vs. technology" into a simplistic form, pushing meaning and intention
into my words that were never there, you're suggesting that you know
better what Aaron Swartz
would-have-thought-if-he-was-still-alive-one-year-later! Really, you
could have abstained from throwing such an abject comment, especially
sweetened from the attack you sent privately, accusing me of "tacit
attack on the Web" and telling me what to do or what not to do.

Stop projecting onto others your frustrations, Melvin. If you keep
seeing me as anti-Web, it's your problem, not mine. That does not
serve anything, and certainly not to respect anyone's memory.

==
hk
Melvin Carvalho
2014-01-12 17:37:40 UTC
Permalink
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Post by Melvin Carvalho
It is true that Ted Nelson once described the web as packaging.
The reason for this was that the browser existed already, as did
forms of HTML. HTTP was new as was the browser connected to the
internet. Also the first browser worldwideweb was an editor,
functionality that was removed later.
Aaron was a big believer in making the web better, and was a
regular attendee at the Linked Data meetups in Boston.
By all means honor his memory, we should all do this, but please
try not to use tragedy to reflect your own personal views, which
he may not have shared.
*** Your interpretation is paranoid. As you're the one mentioning the
Web and Linked Data, are you not the one who is abusing my genuine
remembrance to serve your own agenda?
OK, this is a misunderstanding, thank you for clarifying offline. The only
reference I know of Ted Nelson referring to technology as packaging was in
his series, "Computers for Cynics", in reference to the "Real Story of the
World Wide Web". As you may know Ted was very much in inspiration for the
WWW, with his Xanadu system.

I was unaware he also made this reference to the iphone, which was your
reference. In which case I apologize unreservedly for jumping to a
conclusion.
In addition to "explaining" what Ted Nelson understands as "packaging
vs. technology" into a simplistic form, pushing meaning and intention
into my words that were never there, you're suggesting that you know
better what Aaron Swartz
would-have-thought-if-he-was-still-alive-one-year-later! Really, you
could have abstained from throwing such an abject comment, especially
sweetened from the attack you sent privately, accusing me of "tacit
attack on the Web" and telling me what to do or what not to do.
FWIW, I didnt see any animosity at all in our private exchange, in fact, I
thought it was productive.

As I said it was a misunderstanding, Aaron was an active member of the
Linked Data community, something that I've collaborated with you on in the
past. He probably would have not like the centralization we see today from
large companies such as apple, google, facebook etc. but his primary work
was directed towards making the web better.
Stop projecting onto others your frustrations, Melvin. If you keep
seeing me as anti-Web, it's your problem, not mine. That does not
serve anything, and certainly not to respect anyone's memory.
I mis interpreted your message, and for that I am sorry. It wont happen
again.
==
hk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=YlIv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Loading...